Skip to main content
    Alexander Julian Womenswear by Alexander Julian. Atmospheric mood
    Home/Alexander Julian/Alexander Julian Womenswear
    Alexander Julian Womenswear by Alexander Julian
    Alexander Julian

    Alexander Julian Womenswear

    Soft. Powdery. Close to the skin.

    4-6 hoursModerate4.71992

    What does Alexander Julian Womenswear smell like?

    Alexander Julian Womenswear by Alexander Julian is an eau de toilette fragrance that opens with Apricot, Peach, and Plum, transitions into a heart of Freesia, Iris, and Rose, and settles into a base of Cedar, Musk, and Moss. Expect 2-4 hours longevity and strong sillage. Best suited for spring. Rated 3.5/5, loved by the community, 3 votes.

    Updated

    Main accords

    fruity
    woody
    powdery
    yellow floral
    white floral
    warmfeminineelegantapproachablegraceful
    If this were a songPearl's · Sade

    The Verdict

    What the community says.

    When to Wear8 votes
    Occasions8 votes
    Pros
    • Soft powdery drydown that lingers close
    • Lasts well into the evening
    • Beautiful apricot and peach opening
    • Transports you back to the early 90s
    • Subtle sillage that rewards leaning in
    • Elegant freesia and iris heart
    Cons
    • Bottle design feels dated
    • Some find the powder overwhelming
    • Fruit notes fade faster than expected
    • Others prefer stronger projection
    • The green notes can feel sharp initially
    • Moderate sillage not for everyone

    The Story

    Why it exists.

    Is it for you?

    Made for

    The Romantic

    Alexander Julian Womenswear speaks to a specific kind of person.

    Is it your signature?

    Create a free account to build your scent profile and discover how Alexander Julian Womenswear fits your taste.

    Further Discovery

    You might also like.

    Side by side

    How it compares

    Alexander Julian WomenswearAlexander Julian
    Eau de ToiletteConcentrationEau de Toilette
    Apricot, Peach, PlumTop NotesCedar, Amber
    2-4 hoursLongevity2-4 hours
    StrongSillageStrong
    SpringBest SeasonSpring
    4.67/5Rating2.67/5
    Full comparison
    Alexander Julian WomenswearAlexander Julian
    The FavouritePenhaligon's
    Eau de ToiletteConcentrationEau de Parfum
    Apricot, Peach, PlumTop NotesViolet, Mandarin Orange, Freesia
    2-4 hoursLongevity6-10 hours
    StrongSillageModerate
    SpringBest Season
    4.67/5Rating3.47/5
    Full comparison
    How Alexander Julian Womenswear compares to similar fragrances
    This fragranceAlexander Julian WomenswearAlexander Julian01 Magic OnsenZaraFull comparisonThe FavouritePenhaligon'sFull comparison
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de ToiletteEau de Parfum
    Top NotesApricot, Peach, PlumCedar, AmberViolet, Mandarin Orange, Freesia
    Longevity2-4 hours2-4 hours6-10 hours
    SillageStrongStrongModerate
    Best SeasonSpringSpring
    Rating4.67/52.67/53.47/5

    Similar character

    This perfume reminds of

    78% match01 Magic Onsen by Zara
    Zara
    01 Magic Onsen
    2.7
    Compare prices
    72% matchThe Favourite by Penhaligon's
    Penhaligon's
    The Favourite
    3.5
    Compare prices
    72% matchAva by Badgley Mischka
    Badgley Mischka
    Ava
    4.0
    Compare prices
    72% matchSun Moon Stars by Karl Lagerfeld
    Karl Lagerfeld
    Sun Moon Stars
    3.7
    Compare prices
    Coming soonImage Woman by Cerruti
    Cerruti
    Image Woman
    Coming soon
    Coming soonMiss Arpels by Van Cleef & Arpels
    Van Cleef & Arpels
    Miss Arpels
    4.0
    Coming soon
    Coming soonMimosa Spearmint by Bath & Body Works
    Bath & Body Works
    Mimosa Spearmint
    3.6
    Coming soon
    Coming soonTrend Lei by Les Copains
    Les Copains
    Trend Lei
    3.5
    Coming soon

    Community taste

    People who like this also like

    Reviews

    What others think.

    Apricot and powdery florals over cedar, this 1992 composition is soft and intimate. What does the drydown smell like to you?

    Good to know

    About Alexander Julian Womenswear.

    Community recordMaintained by the Silloria research deskSpotted an error? Suggest an edit