Skip to main content
    Bombshell Luxe (2017) by Victoria's Secret. Atmospheric mood
    Home/Victoria's Secret/Bombshell Luxe (2017)
    Bombshell Luxe (2017) by Victoria's Secret
    Victoria's Secret

    Bombshell Luxe (2017)

    Fresh-cut peonies. Exotic fruits. Unapologetic glamour.

    6-8 hoursModerate5.02017

    As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links to eBay and other retailers can earn us a commission too, at no extra cost to you.

    What does Bombshell Luxe (2017) smell like?

    Bombshell Luxe (2017) by Victoria's Secret is an eau de parfum fragrance that opens with Strawberry, Citruses, and Pineapple, transitions into a heart of Peony, Red Fruits, and Jasmine, and settles into a base of Woody Notes, Moss, and Musk. Expect 6-10 hours longevity and moderate sillage. Best suited for summer. Rated 3.5/5, loved by the community, 3 votes.

    Updated

    Main accords

    fruity
    sweet
    fresh
    floral
    white floral
    FemininePlayfulConfidentSensualYouthful
    If this were a songLevitating · Dua Lipa

    The Verdict

    What the community says.

    When to Wear6 votes
    Occasions4 votes
    Pros
    • Lasts through a full workday on most skin types
    • Peony heart keeps it from becoming just another sweet scent
    • Moderate sillage, present without being aggressive
    • Collector's bottle looks stunning on a vanity
    • Fresh enough for daytime, warm enough for evening
    Cons
    • Some find the sweetness leans synthetic
    • Moderate sillage disappoints those wanting more projection
    • Can feel generic if you've worn a lot of fruity-florals
    • Not for anyone who prefers understated fragrance
    • The sweetness doesn't fade as much as it settles

    The Story

    Why it exists.

    Is it for you?

    Made for

    The Romantic

    Bombshell Luxe (2017) speaks to a specific kind of person.

    Is it your signature?

    Create a free account to build your scent profile and discover how Bombshell Luxe (2017) fits your taste.

    Further Discovery

    You might also like.

    Side by side

    How it compares

    Bombshell Luxe (2017)Victoria's Secret
    Sweet Like CandyAriana Grande
    Eau de ParfumConcentrationEau de Parfum
    Strawberry, Citruses, PineappleTop Notes—
    6-10 hoursLongevity4-6 hours
    ModerateSillageModerate
    SummerBest SeasonSpring
    5/5Rating4.05/5
    Full comparison
    Bombshell Luxe (2017)Victoria's Secret
    TeaseVictoria's Secret
    Eau de ParfumConcentrationEau de Parfum
    Strawberry, Citruses, PineappleTop NotesPear, Litchi, Red Apple
    6-10 hoursLongevity4-6 hours
    ModerateSillageModerate
    SummerBest SeasonSpring
    5/5Rating4.11/5
    Full comparison
    How Bombshell Luxe (2017) compares to similar fragrances
    This fragranceBombshell Luxe (2017)Victoria's SecretSweet Like CandyAriana GrandeFull comparisonTeaseVictoria's SecretFull comparison
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de ParfumEau de Parfum
    Top NotesStrawberry, Citruses, Pineapple—Pear, Litchi, Red Apple
    Longevity6-10 hours4-6 hours4-6 hours
    SillageModerateModerateModerate
    Best SeasonSummerSpringSpring
    Rating5/54.05/54.11/5

    The collection

    From the same collection

    Bombshell by Victoria's Secret
    Victoria's Secret
    Bombshell
    4.0
    Compare prices
    Bombshell Seduction by Victoria's Secret
    Victoria's Secret
    Bombshell Seduction
    4.2
    Compare prices
    Coming soonBombshell Summer by Victoria's Secret
    Victoria's Secret
    Bombshell Summer
    Coming soon
    Coming soonBombshell Night by Victoria's Secret
    Victoria's Secret
    Bombshell Night
    Coming soon

    Community taste

    People who like this also like

    Curated Guides

    Explore Bombshell Luxe (2017) in our guides

    Reviews

    What others think.

    The tropical fruit opening hits everyone the same way, then the peony arrives and opinions split. Where did it land for you?

    Good to know

    About Bombshell Luxe (2017).

    Community recordMaintained by the Silloria research deskSpotted an error? Suggest an edit