Skip to main content
    Woods / Icelandic by Brand No More. Atmospheric mood
    Home/Brand No More/Woods / Icelandic
    Woods / Icelandic by Brand No More
    Brand No More

    Woods / Icelandic

    Cold cliffs. Warm smoke. Unmistakable contrast.

    6-8 hoursModerate4.02021

    The Scent Journey

    Woods / Icelandic by Brand No More is a fragrance that opens with Ginger, Myrtle, and Bergamot, transitions into a heart of Guaiac Wood, Frankincense, and Hazelnut, and settles into a base of Cedarwood, Ambergris, and Moss. Expect 4-6 hours longevity and strong sillage. Best suited for spring and summer. Rated 3.5/5, divisive by the community, 3 votes.

    Main accords

    aromatic
    green
    woody
    citrus
    fruity
    Contemplative isolationSharp green clarityMineral earthinessMeditative woodyStark elegance
    If this were a songHolocene · Bon Iver

    The Verdict

    What the community says.

    When to Wear13 votes
    Occasions8 votes
    Pros
    • Bright bergamot sparkles at first
    • Ginger adds clean heat
    • Hazelnut gives subtle nutty warmth
    • Moss grounds the drydown
    • Moderate sillage stays intimate
    • Distinct Icelandic character
    • Well-balanced green-spice blend
    Cons
    • Synthetic amber can feel cheap
    • Initial ginger may be sharp
    • Moss can be too earthy for some
    • Longevity fades after 6 hours on dry skin
    • Not ideal for hot climates
    • Green notes dominate early phase

    The Story

    Why it exists.

    Is it for you?

    Made for

    The Sophisticate

    Woods / Icelandic speaks to a specific kind of person.

    Is it your signature?

    Create a free account to build your scent profile and discover how Woods / Icelandic fits your taste.

    Further Discovery

    You might also like.

    Side by side

    How it compares

    Woods / IcelandicBrand No More
    Woody MoodOlfactive Studio
    ConcentrationEau de Parfum
    Ginger, Myrtle, BergamotTop NotesGinger, Bergamot, Saffron
    4-6 hoursLongevity6-10 hours
    StrongSillageModerate
    SpringBest SeasonFall
    4/5Rating3.92/5
    Full comparison
    Woods / IcelandicBrand No More
    BabycatYves Saint Laurent
    ConcentrationEau de Parfum
    Ginger, Myrtle, BergamotTop NotesBlack Pepper, Elemi, Pink Pepper
    4-6 hoursLongevity6-10 hours
    StrongSillageStrong
    SpringBest SeasonFall
    4/5Rating4.24/5
    Full comparison
    How Woods / Icelandic compares to similar fragrances
    This fragranceWoods / IcelandicBrand No MoreWoody MoodOlfactive StudioFull comparisonBabycatYves Saint LaurentFull comparison
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de Parfum
    Top NotesGinger, Myrtle, BergamotGinger, Bergamot, SaffronBlack Pepper, Elemi, Pink Pepper
    Longevity4-6 hours6-10 hours6-10 hours
    SillageStrongModerateStrong
    Best SeasonSpringFallFall
    Rating4/53.92/54.24/5

    Similar character

    This perfume reminds of

    75% matchWoody Mood by Olfactive Studio
    Olfactive Studio
    Woody Mood
    3.9
    Compare prices
    65% matchBabycat by Yves Saint Laurent
    Yves Saint Laurent
    Babycat
    4.2
    Compare prices
    61% matchOajan by Parfums de Marly
    Parfums de Marly
    Oajan
    4.4
    Compare prices
    Coming soonBois Impérial (eau De Parfum) by Essential Parfums
    Essential Parfums
    Bois Impérial (eau De Parfum)
    Coming soon
    Coming soonGrand Soir (eau De Parfum) by Maison Francis Kurkdjian
    Maison Francis Kurkdjian
    Grand Soir (eau De Parfum)
    Coming soon
    Coming soonArctic Wood by Le Labo
    Le Labo
    Arctic Wood
    Coming soon
    Coming soonNordic Forest by Mancera
    Mancera
    Nordic Forest
    Coming soon
    Coming soonFjord by Byredo
    Byredo
    Fjord
    Coming soon

    Community taste

    People who like this also like

    Reviews

    What others think.

    Did this scent's polarising ginger-myrtle opening with hints of Icelandic moss catch you off guard, or did the smoked wood finish win you over?

    Good to know

    About Woods / Icelandic.

    Community recordMaintained by the Silloria research deskSpotted an error? Suggest an edit