
Worth pour Homme
WorthEau de Toilette1932
Side by side


Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Worth pour Homme | Paco Rabanne Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1932 | 1973 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Odette Breil-Radius | Jean Martel |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Worth pour Homme
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Worth pour Homme | Paco Rabanne Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
This is not a fragrance that asks if you're comfortable. It arrives with its own agenda and assumes you have yours. The presence is firm without being aggressive, present without overwhelming.Worth pour Homme
This is the fragrance your grandfather wore with conviction. That clary sage and rosemary opening hits like a wake-up call, and the honey-oakmoss drydown reminds you why barbershop classics never.Paco Rabanne Pour Homme
The hunt
| Worth pour Homme | Paco Rabanne Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 oz | — | $32.07ecosmetics |
| 200ml | — | $76.29fragrancenet |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Keep comparing
Good to know