
Worth pour Homme
WorthEau de Toilette1932
Side by side
Aramis projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Worth pour Homme | Aramis | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1932 | 1966 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Odette Breil-Radius | Bernard Chant |
| Best season | Spring | Fall |
Scent DNA
Worth pour Homme
Aramis
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Worth pour Homme | Aramis | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
This is not a fragrance that asks if you're comfortable. It arrives with its own agenda and assumes you have yours. The presence is firm without being aggressive, present without overwhelming.Worth pour Homme
Aramis does not ask for your approval. The aldehyde-cumin-leather axis makes a statement that grabs attention. This is a bold, structured masculine that carries its 1966 origins with pride, remaining.Aramis
The hunt
| Worth pour Homme | Aramis | |
|---|---|---|
| 1.7 oz | — | $16.95fragranceshop |
| 250ml | — | $61.59fragrancenet |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Keep comparing
Good to know