
Worth pour Homme
WorthEau de Toilette1932
Side by side
Worth pour Homme peaks in spring, while Open belongs to winter. The side by side below shows where they overlap.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Worth pour Homme | Open | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1932 | 1985 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Odette Breil-Radius | — |
| Best season | Spring | Winter |
Scent DNA
Worth pour Homme
Open
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Worth pour Homme | Open | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
This is not a fragrance that asks if you're comfortable. It arrives with its own agenda and assumes you have yours. The presence is firm without being aggressive, present without overwhelming.Worth pour Homme
This is a tobacco-citrus composition that actually earns its 1985 vintage. Not the fragrance that fills a room, it knows when to step back. Moderate sillage, but the drydown lasts and lasts.Open
Keep comparing
Good to know