
Wildfire
Malbrum Parfums2016
Side by side
Wildfire rates higher with the community, while Pale Fire wears longer on skin.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Wildfire | Pale Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | — | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2016 | 2016 |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Delphine Thierry | Holladay Saltz |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Wildfire
Pale Fire
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Wildfire | Pale Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
The opening hits hard. Peppermint and black pepper make for a sharp, almost confrontational first impression, but it's the costus root in the base that keeps people talking for hours.Wildfire
Pale Fire doesn't try to smell expensive. It smells true. The powdery cocoa and vanilla work as a pair, gourmand enough to comfort, dry enough to keep you interested.Pale Fire
Keep comparing
Good to know