
Wildfire
Malbrum Parfums2016
Side by side
Ashes wears longer on skin, while Wildfire projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Wildfire | Ashes | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | — | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2016 | 2016 |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Delphine Thierry | — |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Wildfire
Ashes
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Wildfire | Ashes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
The opening hits hard. Peppermint and black pepper make for a sharp, almost confrontational first impression, but it's the costus root in the base that keeps people talking for hours.Wildfire
It's not subtle. The absinthe hits sharp, the smoke never fully leaves. But for those who want a fragrance that means something, that has a point of view, this is where to look.Ashes
Keep comparing
Good to know