
Pale Fire
Apoteker TepeEau de Parfum2016
Side by side
Wildfire rates higher with the community, while Pale Fire wears longer on skin.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Pale Fire | Wildfire | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | — |
| Launched | 2016 | 2016 |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Holladay Saltz | Delphine Thierry |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Pale Fire
Wildfire
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Pale Fire | Wildfire | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Pale Fire doesn't try to smell expensive. It smells true. The powdery cocoa and vanilla work as a pair, gourmand enough to comfort, dry enough to keep you interested.Pale Fire
The opening hits hard. Peppermint and black pepper make for a sharp, almost confrontational first impression, but it's the costus root in the base that keeps people talking for hours.Wildfire
Keep comparing
Good to know