Qom Chilom
Stéphane Humbert Lucas 777Eau de Parfum2014
Side by side
Qom Chilom vs. Burqua
Qom Chilom rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.
The essentials
At a glance
| Qom Chilom | Burqua | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2014 | 2010 |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Stéphane Humbert Lucas | Stéphane Humbert Lucas |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Qom Chilom
Leather
Woody
Cherry
Sweet
Powdery
Fruity
Oud
Camphor
Burqua
Woody
Amber
Aromatic
Warm Spicy
Leather
Violet
Oud
Powdery
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Sour CherryRaspberry
InkLeather
Heart
OudCamphorTeakwoodHeliotropeIrisCedarwood
VioletRoseJasmineCardamomSage
Base
LeatherPatchouliVanillaMusk
OudBenzoinMyrrhPatchouliAmberGuaiac WoodTeakwood
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Qom Chilom | Burqua | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
The camphor is the point. That sharp, almost antiseptic quality keeps the cherry from being sweet, the oud from being precious. Most houses play it safe, this one doesn't.Qom Chilom
Built for someone who doesn't need approval. The opening is confrontational, ink and leather, dark and a little strange, but the oud and amber that follow justify the wait. It doesn't perform.Burqua