Red Jungle
SIAM 1928Eau de Parfum2023
Side by side
Red Jungle vs. Tears
Tears rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Red Jungle projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| Red Jungle | Tears | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | — |
| Launched | 2023 | 2022 |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Nutt Wesshasartar | Mathieu Nardin |
| Best season | Fall | Spring |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Red Jungle
Woody
Fruity
Sweet
Vanilla
Powdery
Warm Spicy
Tears
Floral
Amber
Fresh
Iris
Animalic
Green
Soft Spicy
White Floral
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Dried FruitsGrappaRaisin
Green Cognac OilMandarin orange blossomPink Pepper
Heart
OakTonka Bean
LilacIrisFrankincense
Base
CedarwoodSandalwoodVanilla
AmbergrisMusk
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Red Jungle | Tears | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 2-4 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
Most gourmand fragrances hand you sweetness upfront. Red Jungle opens woody, almost furniture-polish assertive, before the dried fruit arrives like a slow secret.Red Jungle
This is not a crowd-pleaser. The Lilac heart skews vintage, almost nostalgic, while the Cognac opening reads more bourbon than bergamot. Worth sampling before committing, especially if you want.Tears