
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme
RabanneEau de Toilette1973
Side by side


Paco Rabanne Pour Homme rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Black Label projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Paco Rabanne Pour Homme | Black Label | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1973 | 1967 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Jean Martel | — |
| Best season | Spring | Fall |
Scent DNA
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme
Black Label
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| Paco Rabanne Pour Homme | Black Label | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
This is the fragrance your grandfather wore with conviction. That clary sage and rosemary opening hits like a wake-up call, and the honey-oakmoss drydown reminds you why barbershop classics never.Paco Rabanne Pour Homme
Built for the hour after the last yes. The fougère structure is classic 1960s British masculine, clean enough for the office, deep enough to linger long after you've left.Black Label
The hunt
| Paco Rabanne Pour Homme | Black Label | |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 oz | $32.07ecosmetics | — |
| 6.8 oz | $116.00ecosmetics | — |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Good to know