Black Tar
Parfumerie ParticulièreEau de Parfum2016
Side by side
Black Tar vs. Tank Battle
Tank Battle wears longer on skin.
The essentials
At a glance
| Black Tar | Tank Battle | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2016 | 2016 |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Amelie Bourgeois, Anne‑Sophie Behaghel | Simon Constantine |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Black Tar
Woody
Mineral
Tuberose
White Floral
Aromatic
Fresh Spicy
Animalic
Tank Battle
Warm Spicy
Patchouli
Woody
Amber
Balsamic
Earthy
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Mineral NotesCade OilVetiver
—Heart
TuberoseGuaiac WoodPatchouli LeafJuniperLabdanum
Clove
Base
AmberwoodCloveMossConcrete
PatchouliLabdanum
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Black Tar | Tank Battle | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
Black Tar does what most fragrances won't: it smells dangerous on purpose. The mineral-tuberose pairing is not a crowd-pleaser, it's a statement. Wear it knowing full well some people won't get it.Black Tar
This is the fragrance that polarizes because it doesn't apologize for what it is. Sweet bubblegum. Dirty patchouli. They shouldn't work together. They do.Tank Battle