Marbert Homme
MarbertEau de Toilette1988
Side by side
Marbert Homme vs. Paco Rabanne Pour Homme
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Marbert Homme projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| Marbert Homme | Paco Rabanne Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1988 | 1973 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | — | Jean Martel |
| Best season | Fall | Spring |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Marbert Homme
Woody
Aromatic
Earthy
Citrus
Green
Mossy
Warm Spicy
Powdery
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme
Aromatic
Fresh Spicy
Mossy
Lavender
Woody
Earthy
Honey
Sweet
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
BergamotSpicy NotesGalbanumLime
RosemaryClary SageRosewood
Heart
PatchouliSandalwoodVetiverCedarwood
LavenderGeraniumTonka Bean
Base
OakmossAmber
OakmossHoneyMuskAmberTobacco
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Marbert Homme | Paco Rabanne Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
The galbanum is the test. It either grabs you in the first five minutes or it does not, but the drydown with oakmoss and amber is what people keep coming back for.Marbert Homme
This is the fragrance your grandfather wore with conviction. That clary sage and rosemary opening hits like a wake-up call, and the honey-oakmoss drydown reminds you why barbershop classics never.Paco Rabanne Pour Homme
The hunt
Best price, size by size
| Marbert Homme | Paco Rabanne Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 oz | — | $32.07ecosmetics |
| 6.8 oz | — | $74.89fragrancenet |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.