Tank Battle
LushEau de Parfum2016
Side by side
Tank Battle vs. Black Tar
Tank Battle wears longer on skin.
The essentials
At a glance
| Tank Battle | Black Tar | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2016 | 2016 |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Simon Constantine | Amelie Bourgeois, Anne‑Sophie Behaghel |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Tank Battle
Warm Spicy
Patchouli
Woody
Amber
Balsamic
Earthy
Black Tar
Woody
Mineral
Tuberose
White Floral
Aromatic
Fresh Spicy
Animalic
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top—
Mineral NotesCade OilVetiver
Heart
Clove
TuberoseGuaiac WoodPatchouli LeafJuniperLabdanum
Base
PatchouliLabdanum
AmberwoodCloveMossConcrete
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Tank Battle | Black Tar | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | strong | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
This is the fragrance that polarizes because it doesn't apologize for what it is. Sweet bubblegum. Dirty patchouli. They shouldn't work together. They do.Tank Battle
Black Tar does what most fragrances won't: it smells dangerous on purpose. The mineral-tuberose pairing is not a crowd-pleaser, it's a statement. Wear it knowing full well some people won't get it.Black Tar