
Fath Pour L'Homme
Jacques FathEau de Toilette1998
Side by side


Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Fath Pour L'Homme | Charles Street | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 1998 | 2011 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Olivier Gillotin | Pierre Bourdon |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Fath Pour L'Homme
Charles Street
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Fath Pour L'Homme | Charles Street | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Most masculine fragrances from this era played it safe, aquatics, ozonics, the usual suspects. Pour L'Homme didn't. The mint-grapefruit opening is crisp, yes, but it actually goes somewhere.Fath Pour L'Homme
The leather here is structural. It provides the framework for the entire composition. Everything else, coffee, raspberry, vanilla, builds around it. For someone who values substance and depth in.Charles Street
Keep comparing
Good to know