Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Charles Street vs. Royal Leather

    Strikingly similar
    New comparison

    Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Charles Street vs. Royal Leather
    Charles StreetRoyal Leather
    ConcentrationEau de Parfum
    Launched20112012
    GenderMaleMale
    PerfumerPierre BourdonRaphaël Haury
    Best seasonFallFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Charles Street

    Leather
    Fruity
    Sweet
    Powdery
    Warm Spicy
    White Floral
    Animalic
    Amber

    Royal Leather

    Leather
    Woody
    Warm Spicy
    Fruity
    Powdery
    Animalic
    Iris
    Sweet

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    CoffeeNutmegAngelicaCarrot SeedThyme
    Ginger FlowerPink PepperSaffron
    Heart
    RaspberrySaffronRoseIrisAfrican Orange FlowerLily of the ValleyJasmineTuberose
    LeatherDried FruitsIris
    Base
    LeatherVanilleAmberOakmossPatchouli
    AmberCedarwoodSandalwood

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Charles Street vs. Royal Leather
    Charles StreetRoyal Leather
    Score4/54/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    The leather here is structural. It provides the framework for the entire composition. Everything else, coffee, raspberry, vanilla, builds around it. For someone who values substance and depth in.Charles Street
    The leather here doesn't bite. It wraps. Softened by iris, sweetened by dried fruits, it becomes something a man wears to dinner rather than a fight. The saffron keeps it interesting.Royal Leather