
Gucci Pour Homme II
GucciEau de Toilette2007
Side by side


Gucci Pour Homme II rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Forbidden for Man projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Gucci Pour Homme II | Forbidden for Man | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2007 | 2016 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Karine Dubreuil-Sereni | Christian Vermorel |
| Best season | Spring | Fall |
Scent DNA
Gucci Pour Homme II
Forbidden for Man
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| Gucci Pour Homme II | Forbidden for Man | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Gucci Pour Homme II is one of the more underappreciated masculine releases from the 2000s. That green violet leaf opening is genuinely distinctive, and the black tea heart gives it a sophistication.Gucci Pour Homme II
Here's the thing about woody-spicy synthetic: it's either forgettable filler or the whole point. Forbidden for Man chose the latter. The composition doesn't apologize for what it is, it doubles down.Forbidden for Man
Good to know