Skip to main content
    HousesNotesPerfumers

    Side by side

    Gucci pour Homme (2003) vs. Mountain Woody Forest

    Very similar
    New comparison

    Gucci pour Homme (2003) peaks in winter, while Mountain Woody Forest belongs to fall. The side by side below shows where they overlap.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Gucci pour Homme (2003) vs. Mountain Woody Forest
    Gucci pour Homme (2003)Mountain Woody Forest
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Toilette
    Launched20032022
    GenderMaleMale
    PerfumerMichel AlmairacFabrice Pellegrin, Coralie Spicher
    Best seasonWinterFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Gucci pour Homme (2003)

    Woody
    Amber
    Smoky
    Aromatic
    Warm Spicy
    Balsamic
    Leather
    Powdery

    Mountain Woody Forest

    Woody
    Aromatic
    Smoky
    Leather
    Conifer
    Powdery
    Violet
    Fresh Spicy

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    ArtemisiaBasilBergamotLavenderLemonPetitgrainGinger
    Siberian Stone PineBlack PepperNutmeg
    Heart
    CedarwoodPink PepperSandalwoodPatchouliOrris RootCarnationGeraniumJasmine
    FrankincenseJuniper
    Base
    IncenseLeatherAmberVetiverLabdanumVanillaOakmossTonka BeanMuskSage
    LeatherGuaiac WoodWoody Notes

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Gucci pour Homme (2003) vs. Mountain Woody Forest
    Gucci pour Homme (2003)Mountain Woody Forest
    Score4/54/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Gucci pour Homme does not try to impress, and that restraint is exactly why it works. The woody-amber drydown with frankincense and vetiver feels expensive without being loud.Gucci pour Homme (2003)
    The value is undeniable. Zara made a fragrance that smells like it cost three times as much. If you're after a wearable mountain forest, pine, smoke, a hint of leather.Mountain Woody Forest