Skip to main content
    HousesNotesPerfumers

    Side by side

    Gucci pour Homme (2003) vs. Dreckig Bleiben

    Very similar
    New comparison

    Gucci pour Homme (2003) rates higher with the community.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Gucci pour Homme (2003) vs. Dreckig Bleiben
    Gucci pour Homme (2003)Dreckig Bleiben
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Parfum
    Launched20032013
    GenderMaleUnisex
    PerfumerMichel AlmairacMark Buxton
    Best seasonWinterFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Gucci pour Homme (2003)

    Woody
    Amber
    Smoky
    Aromatic
    Warm Spicy
    Balsamic
    Leather
    Powdery

    Dreckig Bleiben

    Woody
    Aromatic
    Fresh Spicy
    Citrus
    Vanilla
    Balsamic
    Powdery
    Amber

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    ArtemisiaBasilBergamotLavenderLemonPetitgrainGinger
    Mandarin OrangeGingerBergamotNeroli
    Heart
    CedarwoodPink PepperSandalwoodPatchouliOrris RootCarnationGeraniumJasmine
    Gurjan BalsamElemi ResinLabdanum
    Base
    IncenseLeatherAmberVetiverLabdanumVanillaOakmossTonka BeanMuskSage
    VanillaCedarGuaiac WoodSandalwood

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Gucci pour Homme (2003) vs. Dreckig Bleiben
    Gucci pour Homme (2003)Dreckig Bleiben
    Score4/53.5/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Gucci pour Homme does not try to impress, and that restraint is exactly why it works. The woody-amber drydown with frankincense and vetiver feels expensive without being loud.Gucci pour Homme (2003)
    This one earns its drydown. The opening is polite enough, citrus, neroli, a clean handshake. But patience reveals the smoke, the guaiac, the resin that doesn't care if you're ready.Dreckig Bleiben