Skip to main content
    HousesNotesPerfumers

    Side by side

    Musa Paradisiaca vs. Shanghai 1930

    Very similar
    New comparison

    Musa Paradisiaca rates higher with the community.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Musa Paradisiaca vs. Shanghai 1930
    Musa ParadisiacaShanghai 1930
    ConcentrationExtrait de ParfumEau de Parfum
    Launched20212023
    GenderUnisexUnisex
    PerfumerArturetto Landi, Cristian CavagnaArturetto Landi
    Best seasonFallSpring

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Musa Paradisiaca

    Green
    Yellow Floral
    Tuberose
    White Floral
    Animalic
    Fresh
    Amber
    Aromatic

    Shanghai 1930

    White Floral
    Sweet
    Floral
    Fruity
    Tuberose
    Tropical
    Green
    Ozonic

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    Banana LeafIvory Coast gingerFrench Celery
    Green TeaMangoPlumViolet LeafCinnamon
    Heart
    NarcissusYlang-Ylang
    TuberoseJasmineMagnoliaYlang-YlangChampa FlowerOrchid
    Base
    TuberoseAmbergrisCivetSandalwoodVanillaTonka BeanIvory Coast Cocoa
    VanillaTonka BeanAmberSandalwoodMyrrh

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Musa Paradisiaca vs. Shanghai 1930
    Musa ParadisiacaShanghai 1930
    Score4/53.5/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagestrongmoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Most tuberose compositions go soft. This one leans green, almost vegetable at the opening, then keeps surprising as the animalic base arrives, ambergris and civet don't ask permission.Musa Paradisiaca
    Green tea and tuberose either pulls you in or doesn't, there's no negotiating with this composition. The interplay between crisp tea and lush florals creates something that refuses to be polite.Shanghai 1930