Skip to main content
    Silloria
    BrandsNotesPerfumers
    Log inSign up

    Side by side

    Cesare Paciotti For Him vs. Gucci pour Homme (2003)

    Very similar
    New comparison

    Gucci pour Homme (2003) rates higher with the community.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Cesare Paciotti For Him vs. Gucci pour Homme (2003)
    Cesare Paciotti For HimGucci pour Homme (2003)
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Toilette
    Launched20112003
    GenderMaleMale
    Perfumer—Michel Almairac
    Best seasonFallWinter

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Cesare Paciotti For Him

    Woody
    Warm Spicy
    Musky
    Floral
    Fresh Spicy
    Powdery
    Violet
    Aromatic

    Gucci pour Homme (2003)

    Woody
    Amber
    Smoky
    Aromatic
    Warm Spicy
    Balsamic
    Leather
    Powdery

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    CardamomGingerBergamotLavender
    ArtemisiaBasilBergamotLavenderLemonPetitgrainGinger
    Heart
    VioletRose
    CedarwoodPink PepperSandalwoodPatchouliOrris RootCarnationGeraniumJasmine
    Base
    Cashmere WoodMusk
    IncenseLeatherAmberVetiverLabdanumVanillaOakmossTonka BeanMuskSage

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Cesare Paciotti For Him vs. Gucci pour Homme (2003)
    Cesare Paciotti For HimGucci pour Homme (2003)
    Score3.5/54/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    This fragrance has a real argument with itself, warm spice against cool violet, woody softness against the bite of ginger. The lavender-violet combo is genuinely unusual for a men's fragrance.Cesare Paciotti For Him
    Gucci pour Homme does not try to impress, and that restraint is exactly why it works. The woody-amber drydown with frankincense and vetiver feels expensive without being loud.Gucci pour Homme (2003)