Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Ho Hang vs. Lanvin for Men

    Ho Hang by Balenciaga bottle

    Ho Hang

    Balenciaga
    Eau de Toilette1972
    Very similar
    New comparison

    Lanvin for Men rates higher with the community.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Ho Hang vs. Lanvin for Men
    Ho HangLanvin for Men
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Toilette
    Launched19721979
    GenderMaleMale
    PerfumerRaymond ChaillanAndré Fraysse
    Best seasonWinterFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Ho Hang

    Amber
    Aromatic
    Fresh Spicy
    Woody
    Warm Spicy
    Citrus
    Vanilla
    Balsamic

    Lanvin for Men

    Aromatic
    Amber
    Musky
    White Floral
    Citrus
    Floral
    Woody
    Animalic

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    LavenderBergamotBasilOrangeLemon
    Clary SageBergamotLemonPetitgrain
    Heart
    RosewoodCarnationGeraniumPatchouliCedar
    JasmineRoseCarnationMarjoram
    Base
    LabdanumBenzoinVanillaTonka BeanAmberMusk
    LabdanumCivetVetiverLeather

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Ho Hang vs. Lanvin for Men
    Ho HangLanvin for Men
    Score4/54.5/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    This was never the entrance fragrance. It's the one that lingers after everyone else has left. A 1972 Balenciaga that rewards patience, woody-spicy warmth that builds quietly, earned and understated.Ho Hang
    Some fragrances announce themselves. This one sits in the room like it belongs there, green and animalic, dry as old books, with a warmth that never asks permission.Lanvin for Men

    The hunt

    Best price, size by size

    Best price by size: Ho Hang vs. Lanvin for Men
    Ho HangLanvin for Men
    3.4 oz$22.39fragrancenet

    Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.