Park Royal
Anglia Perfumery1929
Side by side
Park Royal vs. Acqua di Parma Colonia
Acqua di Parma Colonia rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Park Royal projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| Park Royal | Acqua di Parma Colonia | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | — | Cologne |
| Launched | 1929 | 1916 |
| Gender | Male | Unisex |
| Perfumer | William Thomson | — |
| Best season | Fall | Summer |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Park Royal
Green
Fresh Spicy
Aromatic
Warm Spicy
Citrus
Balsamic
Woody
Earthy
Acqua di Parma Colonia
Citrus
Aromatic
Fresh Spicy
Woody
Lavender
Fresh
Musky
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Sicilian LemonGalbanumCedar NeedlesRosemary
LemonBergamotOrange
Heart
NutmegClovesLavender
LavenderLemon VerbenaRoseRosemary
Base
PatchouliAmberMossWoodsy Notes
VetiverSandalwoodPatchouli
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Park Royal | Acqua di Parma Colonia | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 2-4 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
Park Royal is a quieter, more contemplative fragrance than its name might suggest. It's not trying to announce itself from across the room, which makes it a better daily wearer than most designers.Park Royal
Some fragrances fill a room. Colonia doesn't need to. That's the whole point. Over a century old, this is the Italian argument for restraint, clean enough to wear anywhere.Acqua di Parma Colonia