Acqua di Parma Colonia
Acqua di ParmaCologne1916
Side by side
Acqua di Parma Colonia vs. Park Royal
Acqua di Parma Colonia rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Park Royal projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| Acqua di Parma Colonia | Park Royal | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Cologne | — |
| Launched | 1916 | 1929 |
| Gender | Unisex | Male |
| Perfumer | — | William Thomson |
| Best season | Summer | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Acqua di Parma Colonia
Citrus
Aromatic
Fresh Spicy
Woody
Lavender
Fresh
Musky
Park Royal
Green
Fresh Spicy
Aromatic
Warm Spicy
Citrus
Balsamic
Woody
Earthy
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
LemonBergamotOrange
Sicilian LemonGalbanumCedar NeedlesRosemary
Heart
LavenderLemon VerbenaRoseRosemary
NutmegClovesLavender
Base
VetiverSandalwoodPatchouli
PatchouliAmberMossWoodsy Notes
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Acqua di Parma Colonia | Park Royal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
Some fragrances fill a room. Colonia doesn't need to. That's the whole point. Over a century old, this is the Italian argument for restraint, clean enough to wear anywhere.Acqua di Parma Colonia
Park Royal is a quieter, more contemplative fragrance than its name might suggest. It's not trying to announce itself from across the room, which makes it a better daily wearer than most designers.Park Royal