
Fleur de Chine
Tom FordEau de Parfum2013
Side by side
Fleur de Chine rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Fleur de Chine | Arpège | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2013 | 1975 |
| Gender | Unisex | Female |
| Perfumer | Rodrigo Flores-Roux | André Fraysse |
| Best season | — | Fall |
Scent DNA
Fleur de Chine
Arpège
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Fleur de Chine | Arpège | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
This isn't the Tom Ford that announces itself. It's the one that lingers after you've left the room. Magnolia-forward and quietly beautiful, but with enough amber and hinoki to keep people asking.Fleur de Chine
Not every fragrance needs to fill the room. Arpège EDP rewards those who understand that restraint is its own power. The aldehydic-floral-chypre structure isn't for everyone.Arpège
The hunt
| Fleur de Chine | Arpège | |
|---|---|---|
| 3.3 oz | — | $31.24ecosmetics |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Keep comparing
Good to know