
Safari for Men
Ralph LaurenEau de Toilette1992
Side by side


Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Safari for Men | Fougere Royale (2010) | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 1992 | 2010 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | — | Rodrigo Flores-Roux |
| Best season | Winter | — |
Scent DNA
Safari for Men
Fougere Royale (2010)
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Safari for Men | Fougere Royale (2010) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Safari for Men feels like a time capsule from 1992, and that is exactly its appeal. The coriander, leather, and oakmoss drydown have a classic masculinity that newer releases rarely replicate.Safari for Men
This is the fougère others measure themselves against. The 2010 version doesn't reinvent the wheel, it tightens the spokes. Herbal-forward, mossy, warm. Lasts a full workday without asking permission.Fougere Royale (2010)
Keep comparing
Good to know