Paco Energy
RabanneEDT1998
Side by side
Paco Energy vs. Clinique Happy
Clinique Happy wears longer on skin, while Paco Energy projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| Paco Energy | Clinique Happy | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | EDT | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1998 | 1998 |
| Gender | Unisex | Female |
| Perfumer | Rosendo Mateu | Jean-Claude Delville |
| Best season | Summer | Summer |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Paco Energy
Citrus
White Floral
Fresh
Aldehydic
Woody
Musky
Lavender
Powdery
Clinique Happy
Citrus
Floral
White Floral
Green
Sweet
Fresh Spicy
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Bitter OrangeGrapefruitJuniper BerriesNeroli
GrapefruitBlood GrapefruitMandarin orange treeMandarin OrangeBay LeafBergamot
Heart
CyclamenGrass
Boysenberry BlossomJasmineOrchid
Base
CedarMuskVetiver
MimosaMagnoliaLily of the Valley
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Paco Energy | Clinique Happy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 2-4 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
This is aldehydic citrus done the 1998 way, bright, soapy undertones that feel less like a fragrance and more like clean skin. If you're chasing projection, look elsewhere.Paco Energy
Happy earns its name. Not by being safe or simple, by being the kind of bright that doesn't apologize for itself. The grapefruit opening hits sharp, the florals settle warm.Clinique Happy