Living Grace
PhilosophyEau de Toilette2012
Side by side
Living Grace vs. Amazing Grace
Two distinct takes on a related mood. The side by side below shows where they overlap and where they part ways.
The essentials
At a glance
| Living Grace | Amazing Grace | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2012 | 1996 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | — | Tanya Petrakov |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Living Grace
White Floral
Fresh
Musky
Green
Citrus
Floral
Powdery
Amazing Grace
Floral
Musky
Citrus
White Floral
Rose
Powdery
Fresh Spicy
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top—
BergamotGrapefruitMandarin Orange
Heart
Neroli
FreesiaRoseJasmine
Base
MuskLily of the Valley
Musk
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Living Grace | Amazing Grace | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
Living Grace doesn't perform. That's the whole point. It's the fragrance for days when you want clean without the announcement, freshness without the performance.Living Grace
Here's the thing about Amazing Grace: it doesn't announce itself. It smells like you, but better, the version of you that always smells put-together without trying. Not projecting, not lingering.Amazing Grace
The hunt
Best price, size by size
| Living Grace | Amazing Grace | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.27 oz | — | $13.29fragrancenet |
| 2 oz | — | $67.00ecosmetics |
| 4 oz | — | $88.00ecosmetics |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.