
Mugler Cologne
MuglerCologne2001
Side by side
Mugler Cologne rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while We're for Men projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Mugler Cologne | We're for Men | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Cologne | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2001 | 1996 |
| Gender | Unisex | Male |
| Perfumer | Alberto Morillas | Maurice Roucel |
| Best season | Summer | Fall |
Scent DNA
Mugler Cologne
We're for Men
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| Mugler Cologne | We're for Men | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Not every fragrance needs to announce itself. Mugler Cologne sits close, speaks softly, and lets you walk away with the memory of clean skin. If that sounds boring, you are probably not its person.Mugler Cologne
The raspberry heart is the tell. Tart, almost unexpected in this context. It sits there deliberately, a wink in the green. Some find the powdery drydown divisive.We're for Men
Good to know