
Uomo?
MoschinoEau de Toilette1998
Side by side
Burberrys for Men (1981) rates higher with the community.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Uomo? | Burberrys for Men (1981) | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Cologne |
| Launched | 1998 | 1981 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Olivier Cresp | — |
| Best season | Spring | Fall |
Scent DNA
Uomo?
Burberrys for Men (1981)
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Uomo? | Burberrys for Men (1981) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Value scores like this don't lie. Uomo smells more expensive than it costs, citrus-fresh, quietly woody, built with that clean Italian sensibility that reads as effortless rather than cheap.Uomo?
The British call it restraint. Until the civet kicks in. This is the house's first fragrance, a 1981 original that chose conviction over caution. The leather-animalic drydown isn't for everyone.Burberrys for Men (1981)
The hunt
| Uomo? | Burberrys for Men (1981) | |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5 oz | $23.00ecosmetics | — |
| 4.2 oz | $18.00ecosmetics | — |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Keep comparing
Good to know