
Aquazur
LancasterEau de Toilette2004
Side by side
Chloé Fleur de Parfum wears longer on skin, while Aquazur projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Aquazur | Chloé Fleur de Parfum | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Parfum |
| Launched | 2004 | 2016 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Francis Kurkdjian | Michel Almairac, Mylène Alran |
| Best season | Summer | Spring |
Scent DNA
Aquazur
Chloé Fleur de Parfum
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Aquazur | Chloé Fleur de Parfum | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 2-4 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
It smells like a place you've been once and think about constantly. The kind of afternoon where the light turns everything gold and the air smells like verbena. You don't wear Aquazur to be noticed.Aquazur
The opening is sheer, almost too light for some. But that's the point. It builds like a thought, not a statement. The fragrance prefers to be discovered than announced.Chloé Fleur de Parfum
Keep comparing
Good to know