
Eau de Lalique
Lalique2003
Side by side
Wild Pears wears longer on skin.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Eau de Lalique | Wild Pears | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | — | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2003 | 2011 |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Emilie Bevierre-Coppermann, Jean-Claude Ellena | Pierre Montale |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Eau de Lalique
Wild Pears
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Eau de Lalique | Wild Pears | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
For a fragrance from 2003, Eau de Lalique holds up surprisingly well. The citrus-spice opening is punchy, and the woody-benzoin drydown is genuinely cozy.Eau de Lalique
Montale built a reputation on bold, room-filling intensity. Wild Pears is the exception that proves the rule, their version of tender. The pear is real, the vanilla generous.Wild Pears
The hunt
| Eau de Lalique | Wild Pears | |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 oz | — | $69.56ecosmetics |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Keep comparing
Good to know