
Milano Collection 2009
KaneboEau de Toilette2009
Side by side
Noa rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Milano Collection 2009 projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Milano Collection 2009 | Noa | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2009 | 1998 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | — | Olivier Cresp |
| Best season | Spring | Spring |
Scent DNA
Milano Collection 2009
Noa
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Milano Collection 2009 | Noa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 2-4 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
This is the fragrance that ozonic haters will turn around on. The melon doesn't read as synthetic watermelon candy, it's the pale, cool kind, the flesh just beneath the rind.Milano Collection 2009
Some fragrances announce themselves. Noa doesn't need to. The coffee note gives it warmth where others go linear, and that powdery finish keeps drawing you back. Weightless, yes.Noa
The hunt
| Milano Collection 2009 | Noa | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 oz | — | $40.98ecosmetics |
| 1.7 oz | — | $39.51ecosmetics |
| 3.4 oz | — | $34.50ecosmetics |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Keep comparing
Good to know