Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Gucci pour Homme (2003) vs. Falling Trees

    Very similar
    New comparison

    Gucci pour Homme (2003) peaks in winter, while Falling Trees belongs to fall. The side by side below shows where they overlap.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Gucci pour Homme (2003) vs. Falling Trees
    Gucci pour Homme (2003)Falling Trees
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Parfum
    Launched20032016
    GenderMaleUnisex
    PerfumerMichel AlmairacMathieu Nardin
    Best seasonWinterFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Gucci pour Homme (2003)

    Woody
    Amber
    Smoky
    Aromatic
    Warm Spicy
    Balsamic
    Leather
    Powdery

    Falling Trees

    Woody
    Amber
    Aromatic
    Earthy
    Balsamic
    Warm Spicy
    Fresh Spicy
    Smoky

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    ArtemisiaBasilBergamotLavenderLemonPetitgrainGinger
    JuniperBergamotElemi ResinBlack Pepper
    Heart
    CedarwoodPink PepperSandalwoodPatchouliOrris RootCarnationGeraniumJasmine
    FrankincenseMyrrh
    Base
    IncenseLeatherAmberVetiverLabdanumVanillaOakmossTonka BeanMuskSage
    OakmossBenzoin

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Gucci pour Homme (2003) vs. Falling Trees
    Gucci pour Homme (2003)Falling Trees
    Score4/54/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Gucci pour Homme does not try to impress, and that restraint is exactly why it works. The woody-amber drydown with frankincense and vetiver feels expensive without being loud.Gucci pour Homme (2003)
    Falling Trees doesn't hedge. It commits. Smells exactly like what it says on the bottle, fresh-felled timber, damp forest floor, smoke from a fire miles away.Falling Trees