
Denim 1976
Denim2016
Side by side
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while Denim 1976 projects louder.
This match is computed by our similarity model. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Denim 1976 | Paco Rabanne Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | — | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 2016 | 1973 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | — | Jean Martel |
| Best season | Fall | Spring |
Scent DNA
Denim 1976
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Denim 1976 | Paco Rabanne Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 2-4 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
If you want aldehydic brightness without spending Dior money, this is a legitimate option. The rich leather drydown alone makes it a truly intelligent choice.Denim 1976
This is the fragrance your grandfather wore with conviction. That clary sage and rosemary opening hits like a wake-up call, and the honey-oakmoss drydown reminds you why barbershop classics never.Paco Rabanne Pour Homme
The hunt
| Denim 1976 | Paco Rabanne Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 oz | — | $32.07ecosmetics |
| 200ml | — | $76.29fragrancenet |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Keep comparing
Paco Rabanne Pour HommevsEgoiste Platinum85%
Paco Rabanne Pour HommevsAzzaro pour Homme79%
Paco Rabanne Pour HommevsPolo79%
Paco Rabanne Pour HommevsQuorum79%
Paco Rabanne Pour HommevsAramis78%
Paco Rabanne Pour HommevsDrakkar Noir78%
Paco Rabanne Pour HommevsKouros77%
Paco Rabanne Pour HommevsZino Davidoff77%Good to know