Clinique Happy
CliniqueEau de Toilette1998
Side by side
Clinique Happy vs. Paco Energy
Clinique Happy wears longer on skin, while Paco Energy projects louder.
The essentials
At a glance
| Clinique Happy | Paco Energy | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | EDT |
| Launched | 1998 | 1998 |
| Gender | Female | Unisex |
| Perfumer | Jean-Claude Delville | Rosendo Mateu |
| Best season | Summer | Summer |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Clinique Happy
Citrus
Floral
White Floral
Green
Sweet
Fresh Spicy
Paco Energy
Citrus
White Floral
Fresh
Aldehydic
Woody
Musky
Lavender
Powdery
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
GrapefruitBlood GrapefruitMandarin orange treeMandarin OrangeBay LeafBergamot
Bitter OrangeGrapefruitJuniper BerriesNeroli
Heart
Boysenberry BlossomJasmineOrchid
CyclamenGrass
Base
MimosaMagnoliaLily of the Valley
CedarMuskVetiver
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Clinique Happy | Paco Energy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
Happy earns its name. Not by being safe or simple, by being the kind of bright that doesn't apologize for itself. The grapefruit opening hits sharp, the florals settle warm.Clinique Happy
This is aldehydic citrus done the 1998 way, bright, soapy undertones that feel less like a fragrance and more like clean skin. If you're chasing projection, look elsewhere.Paco Energy