Chloé Narcisse
ChloéEau de Toilette1992
Side by side
Chloé Narcisse vs. Swann
Swann rates higher with the community, while Chloé Narcisse wears longer on skin.
The essentials
At a glance
| Chloé Narcisse | Swann | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1992 | 1984 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Chloé Narcisse
Sweet
Powdery
White Floral
Warm Spicy
Fruity
Floral
Yellow Floral
Aromatic
Swann
Woody
Amber
Rose
Mossy
Earthy
Floral
Aldehydic
Warm Spicy
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
ApricotOrange BlossomFrangipaniCalendula
AldehydesJasmineGreen Notes
Heart
NarcissusJasmineRoseSpicy Notes
RoseFloral NotesPatchouliOriental Notes
Base
MuskVanillaSandalwoodTolu Balsam
OakmossResinous NotesSandalwoodMuskPowdery Notes
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Chloé Narcisse | Swann | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | strong | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
It's the bitter note that makes Narcisse worth knowing. Everyone expects another sweet floral, and it is, until it isn't. The daffodil adds something unexpected.Chloé Narcisse
That aldehydic opening is the test. Cold, waxy, slightly soapy, it pushes people away before it can pull them in. But if you let Swann warm up, it turns into something quieter and more interesting.Swann