
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was Yesterday
By KilianEau de Parfum2018
Side by side


Interlude Man rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was Yesterday | Interlude Man | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2018 | 2012 |
| Gender | Unisex | Male |
| Perfumer | Pascal Gaurin | Pierre Negrin |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was Yesterday
Interlude Man
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was Yesterday | Interlude Man | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 10+ hours |
| Sillage | moderate | enormous |
No varnish
Three notes that shouldn't work together. They do. The trick is the leather never punishes, it lingers. The kind of scent that earns its ending. This isn't a crowd-pleaser. It's a decision.Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was Yesterday
It does not try to please everyone, and that is precisely why it works. The spice-and-resin architecture is bold but never bloated. A statement piece that rewards patience.Interlude Man
Keep comparing
Interlude ManvsInterlude Black Iris88%
Interlude ManvsOud Wood86%
Interlude ManvsAmber Incense86%
Interlude ManvsShaghaf Oud Abyad86%
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was YesterdayvsTuscan Leather85%
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was YesterdayvsTuscan Leather Intense82%
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was Yesterdayvs5th Avenue Royale76%
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was YesterdayvsCuir Grenat76%Good to know