
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was Yesterday
By KilianEau de Parfum2018
Side by side


5th Avenue Royale rates higher with the community.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was Yesterday | 5th Avenue Royale | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Parfum | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2018 | 2017 |
| Gender | Unisex | Female |
| Perfumer | Pascal Gaurin | — |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was Yesterday
5th Avenue Royale
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was Yesterday | 5th Avenue Royale | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Three notes that shouldn't work together. They do. The trick is the leather never punishes, it lingers. The kind of scent that earns its ending. This isn't a crowd-pleaser. It's a decision.Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was Yesterday
Elizabeth Arden went for something here that most houses approach conservatively: real warmth, depth, and a presence that doesn't apologize for itself.5th Avenue Royale
Keep comparing
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was YesterdayvsTuscan Leather85%
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was YesterdayvsTuscan Leather Intense82%
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was YesterdayvsCuir Grenat76%
5th Avenue RoyalevsOmbre Nomade74%
5th Avenue RoyalevsAmber Musc74%
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was YesterdayvsRose Oud63%
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was YesterdayvsInterlude Man63%
Yes I Was Madly In Love, But That Was YesterdayvsHabanera63%Good to know