Touch for Women
Burberry1998
Side by side
Touch for Women vs. Safari
Safari rates higher with the community.
The essentials
At a glance
| Touch for Women | Safari | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | — | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 1998 | 1990 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Michel Girard | Dominique Ropion |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Touch for Women
Fruity
Woody
Fresh
Sweet
White Floral
Floral
Warm Spicy
Aromatic
Safari
Aromatic
Green
Woody
Fresh Spicy
Balsamic
Floral
Earthy
Sweet
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Red PepperCinnamonBlackberryBlackcurrantCranberryRoseCalifornian orange
—Heart
Lily of the ValleyPeonyPeachJasmineTuberoseRaspberry
NarcissusOrris RootRosemaryRoseJasmineOrange Blossom
Base
CedarwoodOakmossVanillaAlmondTonka Bean
VetiverAmberSandalwoodCedarwoodPatchouli
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Touch for Women | Safari | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
Touch for Women feels like a product of its era, but not in a dated way. The dewy berry opening is genuinely charming, though the tuberose heart might overwhelm those who prefer restraint.Touch for Women
Safari feels like it belongs to a moment when bold, structured fragrances were the standard rather than the exception. But the overall effect is undeniably chic.Safari
The hunt
Best price, size by size
| Touch for Women | Safari | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.27 oz | — | $13.99fragrancenet |
| 4.2 oz | — | $52.49fragrancenet |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.