
Dunhill for Men
Alfred DunhillEau de Toilette1934
Side by side
Jules (2016) wears longer on skin.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| Dunhill for Men | Jules (2016) | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1934 | 2016 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | — | Jean Martel |
| Best season | Fall | Fall |
Scent DNA
Dunhill for Men
Jules (2016)
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Where they fit
Community taste
| Dunhill for Men | Jules (2016) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 4-6 hours | 6-10 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
This is the fragrance men wear when they don't need you to know it. No fireworks. No entrance music. Just a scent that outlasts meetings, dinners, and the commute home.Dunhill for Men
Jules 2016 is not a safe blind buy. The galbanum opening skews sharp and polarising, and the pine-heavy drydown appeals to specific tastes. Sample it twice before committing.Jules (2016)
Keep comparing
Good to know