Skip to main content

    Side by side

    King Tut vs. 8 Mars 1764

    Clearly related
    New comparison

    King Tut wears longer on skin.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: King Tut vs. 8 Mars 1764
    King Tut8 Mars 1764
    ConcentrationEau de Parfum
    Launched20172013
    GenderUnisexMale
    PerfumerHany HafezPhilippe Bousseton
    Best seasonFallSpring

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    King Tut

    Woody
    Vanilla
    Powdery
    Citrus
    Warm Spicy
    Amber
    Tobacco
    Sweet

    8 Mars 1764

    Amber
    Aromatic
    Citrus
    Woody
    Balsamic
    Warm Spicy
    Fresh Spicy

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    LemonBergamotNeroli
    Elemi ResinMandarin OrangeBergamot
    Heart
    HeliotropePatchouliRoseGeraniumJasmine
    CognacLabdanumCoriander
    Base
    VanillaCognacSandalwoodTobaccoAmbergris
    BenzoinVetiverStyrax

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: King Tut vs. 8 Mars 1764
    King Tut8 Mars 1764
    Score3.5/53.5/5
    Longevity6-10 hours4-6 hours
    Sillagestrongstrong

    No varnish

    Real talk

    King Tut is bold without being reckless. The citrus-to-floral-to-warm drydown progression feels intentional and well-paced. The heart remains elegant and grounded.King Tut
    A fragrance for someone who doesn't need the room to know they've entered it. The cognac-labdanum heart is the move, not flashy, but the thing people remember when you're gone.8 Mars 1764