Skip to main content
    Silloria
    BrandsNotesPerfumers
    Log inSign up

    Side by side

    Eat Flowers vs. Emerald Dream

    Very similar
    New comparison

    Eat Flowers rates higher with the community.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Eat Flowers vs. Emerald Dream
    Eat FlowersEmerald Dream
    ConcentrationEau de Parfum—
    Launched20182006
    GenderUnisexFemale
    PerfumerSarah McCartney—
    Best seasonSpringSummer

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Eat Flowers

    White Floral
    Woody
    Powdery
    Yellow Floral
    Iris
    Floral
    Sweet
    Rose

    Emerald Dream

    Fruity
    Aromatic
    Floral
    Powdery
    Fresh Spicy
    Sweet
    White Floral
    Woody

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    Linden BlossomLemon BlossomNeroli
    ApricotBasilHoneysuckleTangerine
    Heart
    IrisLilyTuberoseRoseGeranium
    CyclamenIrisMimosaOrchidPlumCalendulaViolet
    Base
    Cabreuva WoodWoody NotesMusk
    CypressSandalwood

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Eat Flowers vs. Emerald Dream
    Eat FlowersEmerald Dream
    Score3.5/53/5
    Longevity4-6 hours4-6 hours
    Sillagestrongmoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Some fragrances want to start arguments. Eat Flowers wants you to stop and breathe deeply, possibly at a flower market, definitely somewhere sunny. It's iris-forward in a way that could read.Eat Flowers
    Moderate sillage, quiet confidence. This isn't the fragrance that enters before you, it's the one that lingers after you've already gone. The powdery floral heart is soft, not shouty.Emerald Dream