Skip to main content

    Side by side

    Mountain Woody Forest vs. Gucci pour Homme (2003)

    Very similar
    New comparison

    Mountain Woody Forest peaks in fall, while Gucci pour Homme (2003) belongs to winter. The side by side below shows where they overlap.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Mountain Woody Forest vs. Gucci pour Homme (2003)
    Mountain Woody ForestGucci pour Homme (2003)
    ConcentrationEau de ToiletteEau de Toilette
    Launched20222003
    GenderMaleMale
    PerfumerFabrice Pellegrin, Coralie SpicherMichel Almairac
    Best seasonFallWinter

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Mountain Woody Forest

    Woody
    Aromatic
    Smoky
    Leather
    Conifer
    Powdery
    Violet
    Fresh Spicy

    Gucci pour Homme (2003)

    Woody
    Amber
    Smoky
    Aromatic
    Warm Spicy
    Balsamic
    Leather
    Powdery

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    Siberian Stone PineBlack PepperNutmeg
    ArtemisiaBasilBergamotLavenderLemonPetitgrainGinger
    Heart
    FrankincenseJuniper
    CedarwoodPink PepperSandalwoodPatchouliOrris RootCarnationGeraniumJasmine
    Base
    LeatherGuaiac WoodWoody Notes
    IncenseLeatherAmberVetiverLabdanumVanillaOakmossTonka BeanMuskSage

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Mountain Woody Forest vs. Gucci pour Homme (2003)
    Mountain Woody ForestGucci pour Homme (2003)
    Score4/54/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatemoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    The value is undeniable. Zara made a fragrance that smells like it cost three times as much. If you're after a wearable mountain forest, pine, smoke, a hint of leather.Mountain Woody Forest
    Gucci pour Homme does not try to impress, and that restraint is exactly why it works. The woody-amber drydown with frankincense and vetiver feels expensive without being loud.Gucci pour Homme (2003)