Body by Victoria 2002
Victoria's SecretEau de Toilette2002
Side by side
Body by Victoria 2002 vs. My Glow
Body by Victoria 2002 rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.
The essentials
At a glance
| Body by Victoria 2002 | My Glow | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2002 | 2009 |
| Gender | Female | Female |
| Perfumer | Harry Frémont | Harry Frémont |
| Best season | Spring | Summer |
Scent DNA
Main accords
Body by Victoria 2002
Floral
Musky
Powdery
Green
Aquatic
Ozonic
Rose
Fresh
My Glow
Floral
Lavender
Powdery
Fresh
Woody
Green
Rose
Musky
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
FreesiaMimosaMandarin Orange
LavenderFreesiaWater Lily
Heart
CucumberPeonyHyacinthLily
Casablanca LilyPeonyWhite RoseLeaves
Base
White MuskSandalwood
MuskSandalwoodHeliotropeWoody Notes
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| Body by Victoria 2002 | My Glow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 3/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | moderate | moderate |
No varnish
Real talk
Cucumber water, soap lily, and a clean-skin warmth that doesn't shout. If you want a fragrance to announce you, keep scrolling. If you want one that makes people lean in, this is worth knowing.Body by Victoria 2002
Clean and powdery without being soapy, floral without being sweet, warm without being heavy. That's the duality here. Some find it plain; others find it the kind of quiet that's hard to leave behind.My Glow