Skip to main content
    Silloria
    BrandsNotesPerfumers
    Log inSign up

    Side by side

    Firence Eau de Parfum vs. 1872 For Men

    Very similar
    New comparison

    1872 For Men wears longer on skin, while Firence Eau de Parfum projects louder.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Firence Eau de Parfum vs. 1872 For Men
    Firence Eau de Parfum1872 For Men
    ConcentrationEau de ParfumEau de Toilette
    Launched20222001
    GenderMaleMale
    Perfumer—Geza Schön
    Best seasonFall—

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Firence Eau de Parfum

    Aromatic
    Fresh Spicy
    Citrus
    Woody
    Warm Spicy
    Green
    Earthy
    Herbal

    1872 For Men

    Aromatic
    Fresh Spicy
    Citrus
    Woody
    Green
    Floral
    Sweet
    Balsamic

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    BergamotPetitgrainBlack PepperNeroli
    PetitgrainGrapefruitGalbanumBergamotLimeLavenderRosemaryBlack PepperNutmeg
    Heart
    Juniper BerriesLavenderCardamomSageIris
    Clary SageJasmineFreesiaCyclamenMarigold
    Base
    VetiverOakmossLeatherOud
    CedarwoodFrankincensePatchouliMuskAmberLabdanum

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Firence Eau de Parfum vs. 1872 For Men
    Firence Eau de Parfum1872 For Men
    Score4/54/5
    Longevity4-6 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagestrongmoderate

    No varnish

    Real talk

    Clean citrus opening, yes, but underneath, leather and oud settle like a second skin. Vetiver breathes through the whole thing.Firence Eau de Parfum
    Geza Schön does not do simple. Even in a fragrance named for a royal warrant, there is intellectual rigor here. The citrus opening is not cheerful, it is precise.1872 For Men