
We're for Men
ShiseidoEau de Toilette1996
Side by side


Versace Pour Homme rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin, while We're for Men projects louder.
This match is a verified relationship from our fragrance graph. The score weighs each fragrance's notes, accords, mood, occasion, weather fit, gender, and performance — the same scale as the badges on every “reminds of” rail.
The essentials
| We're for Men | Versace Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | Eau de Toilette | Eau de Toilette |
| Launched | 1996 | 2008 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Perfumer | Maurice Roucel | Alberto Morillas |
| Best season | Fall | Spring |
Scent DNA
We're for Men
Versace Pour Homme
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
| We're for Men | Versace Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 2-4 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Sillage | strong | moderate |
No varnish
The raspberry heart is the tell. Tart, almost unexpected in this context. It sits there deliberately, a wink in the green. Some find the powdery drydown divisive.We're for Men
Versace Pour Homme plays a reliable game. The citrus opening is bold but not aggressive, and the cedarwood heart keeps things from getting too soft. The oud in the base is subtle enough not to scare.Versace Pour Homme
The hunt
| We're for Men | Versace Pour Homme | |
|---|---|---|
| Best offer | — | $84.51ecosmetics · Gift Set |
Cheapest in-stock offer per size. Retailer links support Silloria at no extra cost to you.
Good to know