103
ScentBar2011
Side by side
103 vs. Acqua e Zucchero
Acqua e Zucchero rates higher with the community and wears longer on skin.
The essentials
At a glance
| 103 | Acqua e Zucchero | |
|---|---|---|
| Concentration | — | Eau de Parfum |
| Launched | 2011 | 2002 |
| Gender | Unisex | Unisex |
| Best season | Fall | Winter |
Scent DNA
Main accords
103
Sweet
Gourmand
Powdery
Synthetic
Floral
Acqua e Zucchero
Vanilla
Fruity
White Floral
Woody
Powdery
Sweet
Citrus
Shared between both fragrances
The pyramid
Notes, side by side
Top
Cotton CandyOrange
—Heart
AlmondLilac
—Base
HazelnutTonka BeanVanillaWhite MuskAmber
VanillaOrange BlossomForest Fruits
Notes both fragrances share
Community taste
The community verdict
| 103 | Acqua e Zucchero | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Longevity | 6-10 hours | 10+ hours |
| Sillage | moderate | strong |
No varnish
Real talk
Cotton candy isn't a guilty pleasure here, it's the whole point. Warm, sweet, with a lilac-almond heart that keeps it interesting. A picnic in a bottle, and damn good at it.103
Sweet and unapologetic. But this isn't cheap candy, it's the refined version. Think Pink Sugar's soul without the mass-market edge. Profumum Roma built something that smells expensive while staying.Acqua e Zucchero