Skip to main content
    HousesNotesPerfumers

    Side by side

    Royal Copenhagen vs. Giorgio for Men

    Very similar
    New comparison

    Giorgio for Men rates higher with the community.

    The essentials

    At a glance

    Key facts: Royal Copenhagen vs. Giorgio for Men
    Royal CopenhagenGiorgio for Men
    ConcentrationCologneEau de Toilette
    Launched19701984
    GenderMaleMale
    Best seasonFallFall

    Scent DNA

    Main accords

    Royal Copenhagen

    Powdery
    Aromatic
    Floral
    Vanilla
    Sweet
    Woody
    Aldehydic
    Citrus

    Giorgio for Men

    Warm Spicy
    Woody
    Earthy
    Sweet
    Honey
    Amber
    Patchouli
    Floral

    Shared between both fragrances

    The pyramid

    Notes, side by side

    Top
    AldehydesBergamotLemonLimeLavenderGreen NotesCardamom
    AldehydesOrangeBergamotFruity Notes
    Heart
    CarnationRoseJasmineVetiverCedarPatchouliOrris Root
    PatchouliRoseCarnationCinnamonSandalwoodCedarwoodOrris Root
    Base
    MuskHoneyVanillaTobaccoTonka BeanAmberHeliotropeOakmoss
    HoneyOakmossAmberMuskVanillaBenzoinTonka Bean

    Notes both fragrances share

    Community taste

    The community verdict

    Community verdict: Royal Copenhagen vs. Giorgio for Men
    Royal CopenhagenGiorgio for Men
    Score3.5/54/5
    Longevity6-10 hours6-10 hours
    Sillagemoderatestrong

    No varnish

    Real talk

    The aldehydes are the tell. They lift this above a standard aromatic cologne into something powdery, almost soapy in the best way. It's the kind of fragrance that doesn't announce itself.Royal Copenhagen
    Giorgio for Men does not whisper. It announces itself. The aldehydic lift over orange and allspice has an almost electric quality, while the patchouli-cinnamon heart brings unmistakable 80s power.Giorgio for Men